Teel v. State

91 S.W.2d 747, 130 Tex. Crim. 32, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 5, 1936
DocketNo. 17903.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 91 S.W.2d 747 (Teel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teel v. State, 91 S.W.2d 747, 130 Tex. Crim. 32, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77 (Tex. 1936).

Opinions

The offense is driving an automobile while intoxicated; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The appeal bond appearing in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the trial judge. The statute, Art. 818, C. C. P., requires that the bond be approved by both the judge and the sheriff. See Wood v. State, 83 S.W.2d 670, and cases cited.

The appeal bond is also defective in that it fails to state that appellant has been convicted of a felony, as is required by Art. 817, C. C. P. See Moore v. State, 51 S.W.2d 583, and cases cited; also Wells v. State, 76 S.W.2d 1047; Moore v. State, 77 S.W.2d 1046.

Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date in which to perfect his appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dickerson v. State
167 S.W.2d 522 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Ringer Ringer v. State
129 S.W.2d 654 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Moore v. State
126 S.W.2d 667 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Randolph v. State
117 S.W.2d 781 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Farris v. State
116 S.W.2d 370 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.W.2d 747, 130 Tex. Crim. 32, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teel-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.