Teel v. State

91 S.W.2d 747, 130 Tex. Crim. 32, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 5, 1936·No. No. 17903.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

The offense is driving an automobile while intoxicated; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The appeal bond appearing in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the trial judge. The statute, Art. 818, C. C. P., requires that the bond be approved by both the judge and the sheriff. See Wood v. State, 83 S.W.2d 670, and cases cited.

The appeal bond is also defective in that it fails to state that appellant has been convicted of a felony, as is required by Art. 817, C. C. P. See Moore v. State, 51 S.W.2d 583, and cases cited; also Wells v. State, 76 S.W.2d 1047; Moore v. State, 77 S.W.2d 1046.

Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date in which to perfect his appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teel v. State, 91 S.W.2d 747, 130 Tex. Crim. 32, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77 (Tex. 1936).

91 S.W.2d 747 (Teel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickerson v. State
167 S.W.2d 522 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Ringer Ringer v. State
129 S.W.2d 654 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Moore v. State
126 S.W.2d 667 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Randolph v. State
117 S.W.2d 781 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Farris v. State
116 S.W.2d 370 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)