Teel v. State
This text of 91 S.W.2d 747 (Teel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is driving an automobile while intoxicated; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
The appeal bond appearing in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the trial judge. The statute, Art. 818, C. C. P., requires that the bond be approved by both the judge and the sheriff. See Wood v. State,
The appeal bond is also defective in that it fails to state that appellant has been convicted of a felony, as is required by Art. 817, C. C. P. See Moore v. State,
Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date in which to perfect his appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.W.2d 747, 130 Tex. Crim. 32, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teel-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.