Bell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bell v. State

89 S.W.2d 995, 129 Tex. Crim. 551

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 6, 1935

DocketNo. 17736.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 89 S.W.2d 995 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State, 89 S.W.2d 995, 129 Tex. Crim. 551 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

Opinions

Assault with intent to murder is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

The appeal bond appearing in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the judge who tried the case. *Page 552 The approval of the bond by the sheriff and the district judge is essential. See Art. 818, C. C. P., 1925; also Baker v. State, 113 Texas. Crim. Rep., 120, 18 S.W.2d 623; Shadwick v. State, 122 Tex.Crim. Rep., 53 S.W.2d 614; Boggs v. State, 75 S.W.2d 680; Wood v. State, 83 S.W.2d 670; Anderson v. State, 84 S.W.2d 458, and cases therein cited.

Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date in which to perfect his appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE THE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assault with intent to murder is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

The appeal bond appearing in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the judge who tried the case. *Page 552 The approval of the bond by the sheriff and the district judge is essential. See Art. 818, C. C. P., 1925; also Baker v. State, 113 Texas. Crim. Rep., 120, 18 S.W.2d 623; Shadwick v. State, 122 Tex.Crim. Rep., 53 S.W.2d 614; Boggs v. State, 75 S.W.2d 680; Wood v. State, 83 S.W.2d 670; Anderson v. State, 84 S.W.2d 458, and cases therein cited.

Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date in which to perfect his appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE THE APPEAL.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.W.2d 995, 129 Tex. Crim. 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack