Wood v. Commonwealth
This text of 497 S.E.2d 484 (Wood v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
with whom FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge, joins, concurring.
I understand the community caretaker doctrine to be as described in the dissent. Police officers are charged with the duty of promoting public safety and rendering needed assistance. This duty is separate from the detection of crime. The discharge of this duty may, under appropriate circumstances, justify warrantless entry into a residence. However, I do not find such circumstances to have existed in this case. Therefore, I concur in the result reached by the majority.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 S.E.2d 484, 27 Va. App. 21, 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-commonwealth-vactapp-1998.