Winn v. Killian
321 F.3d 911, 2003 WL 730127
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2003·No. No. 01-15901·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinions
ORDER
A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear this matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35. The request for rehearing en banc is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winn v. Killian, 321 F.3d 911, 2003 WL 730127 (9th Cir. 2003).
321 F.3d 911 (Winn v. Killian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coors Brewing Co. v. Méndez-Torres
562 F.3d 3 (First Circuit, 2009)
Commerce Energy, Inc. v. Richard Levin
Sixth Circuit, 2009
Commerce Energy, Inc. v. Levin
554 F.3d 1094 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
Hibbs v. Winn
542 U.S. 88 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Chippewa Trading Co. v. Cox
365 F.3d 538 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Chippewa Trading Co. v. Michael Cox
365 F.3d 538 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Winn v. Killian
321 F.3d 911 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)