Winkelman v. Department of Banking & Finance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Winkelman v. Department of Banking & Finance

537 So. 2d 591, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2308, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4459, 1988 WL 103874

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 11, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2847

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 537 So. 2d 591 (Winkelman v. Department of Banking & Finance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winkelman v. Department of Banking & Finance, 537 So. 2d 591, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2308, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4459, 1988 WL 103874 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the Comptroller of the State of Florida and Head of the Department of Banking and Finance revoking the registration of Charles Wink-elman as an associated person under the Florida Securities and Investor Act upon holdings that (1) Section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), the two-year limitations period which controls violations of the Florida Securities Act, is not applicable to these administrative proceedings, see Farzad v. Department of Professional Regulation, 443 So.2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Landes v. Department of Professional Regulation, 441 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Donaldson v. State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 425 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see generally Canney v. Board of Public Instruction, 278 So.2d 260 (Fla.1973); and (2) Winkelman’s conviction upon his plea of guilty to willfully assisting in the preparation of a false income tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) is the conviction of a crime which involves moral turpitude and as such adequately supports the revocation of his license. See State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Evans, 94 So.2d 730 (Fla.1957); State ex rel. Tullidge v. Hollingsworth, 108 Fla. 607, 146 So. 660 (1933). See also Demoura v. City of Newark, 90 N.J.Super. 225, 217 A.2d 19 (App.Div.1966).

We have considered Winkelman’s other points on appeal and reject them without discussion.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the Comptroller of the State of Florida and Head of the Department of Banking and Finance revoking the registration of Charles Wink-elman as an associated person under the Florida Securities and Investor Act upon holdings that (1) Section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), the two-year limitations period which controls violations of the Florida Securities Act, is not applicable to these administrative proceedings, see Farzad v. Department of Professional Regulation, 443 So.2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Landes v. Department of Professional Regulation, 441 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Donaldson v. State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 425 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see generally Canney v. Board of Public Instruction, 278 So.2d 260 (Fla.1973); and (2) Winkelman’s conviction upon his plea of guilty to willfully assisting in the preparation of a false income tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) is the conviction of a crime which involves moral turpitude and as such adequately supports the revocation of his license. See State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Evans, 94 So.2d 730 (Fla.1957); State ex rel. Tullidge v. Hollingsworth, 108 Fla. 607, 146 So. 660 (1933). See also Demoura v. City of Newark, 90 N.J.Super. 225, 217 A.2d 19 (App.Div.1966).

We have considered Winkelman’s other points on appeal and reject them without discussion.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 591, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2308, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4459, 1988 WL 103874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winkelman-v-department-of-banking-finance-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack