Landes v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.

441 So. 2d 686
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 1983
Docket83-171
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 441 So. 2d 686 (Landes v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landes v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG., 441 So. 2d 686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

441 So.2d 686 (1983)

Mary E. LANDES and Landes Realty, Inc., Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Florida Real Estate Commission, Appellees.

No. 83-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 26, 1983.
Rehearing Denied December 2, 1983.

Barry J. McCaughey of McCaughey, Knaust & Evans, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Tina Hipple, Dept. of Professional Regulation, Div. of Real Estate, Orlando, for appellees.

LEHAN, Judge.

Appellants appeal a final order of the Florida Real Estate Commission finding that appellants had violated chapter 475, Florida Statutes. The order revoked the real estate license of Mary Landes and the registration of Landes Realty, Inc. We affirm.

Appellants argued that the revocation proceedings were barred by the four year statute of limitations for civil actions pursuant to section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1981), because the incidents which gave rise to the proceedings occurred some seven years previously. However, we agree with the First District that "In the absence of specific legislative authority, civil or criminal statutes of limitations are inapplicable to administrative license revocation proceedings." Donaldson v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 425 So.2d 145, 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Appellants also argue that federal bankruptcy law, specifically 11 U.S.C. § 525, prohibits a government from revoking a license of a person who has been a debtor or bankrupt under the federal bankruptcy laws solely because the person has not paid a debt that was discharged in bankruptcy proceedings. We agree with appellants that Mrs. Landes' debt, discharged in a prior bankruptcy proceeding, could not form the sole basis for the license *687 revocation. However, the revocation did not depend on that debt. There was competent, substantial evidence supporting the Commission's final order which noted that other conduct of Mrs. Landes provided grounds for revoking her license.

AFFIRMED.

OTT, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hames v. CITY OF MIAMI FIREFIGHTERS'
980 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Sarasota County v. CITY BANK OF CLEVELAND
902 So. 2d 233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Procacci Commercial Realty v. DHRS
690 So. 2d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Carter v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry
613 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Ong v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION
565 So. 2d 1384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Winkelman v. Department of Banking & Finance
537 So. 2d 591 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 So. 2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landes-v-dept-of-professional-reg-fladistctapp-1983.