Wingfield v. State
139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 153, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 536
This text of 139 S.E. 134 (Wingfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wingfield v. State, 139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 153, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 536 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
The evidence amply authorized the conviction of the defendant, and the special assignments of error upon the rulings of the court on the admissibility of evidence show no harmful error. The defendant has had a legal trial, and the court properly overruled his motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 153, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wingfield-v-state-gactapp-1927.