Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Wingfield v. State

Wingfield v. State

139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 153, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 536
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wingfield v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Ga. App. 504 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1927·No. 18237·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the conviction of the defendant, and the special assignments of error upon the rulings of the court on the admissibility of evidence show no harmful error. The defendant has had a legal trial, and the court properly overruled his motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wingfield v. State, 139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 153, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 536 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

139 S.E. 134 (Wingfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.