Mullins v. State
100 S.E. 755, 24 Ga. App. 357, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 656
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of having, possessing, and controlling intoxicating liquors. The evidence as to her connection with the whisky was entirely circumstantial, and failed* to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of her guilt, and was consistent with the theory of her innocence. The court therefore erred in overruling her motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mullins v. State, 100 S.E. 755, 24 Ga. App. 357, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 656 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
100 S.E. 755 (Mullins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. State
82 S.E.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Bexley v. State
70 S.E.2d 602 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
McBurnett v. State
146 S.E. 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Wingfield v. State
140 S.E. 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)