Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 CHARLOTTE WINELAND, Individually, 8 and SUSAN WINELAND, as Personal Cause No. C19-0793RSL Representative of the Estate of JOHN DALE 9 WINELAND, deceased, ORDER 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Puget Sound Commerce Center, Inc.’s 16 Daubert Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Captain Arnold Moore; Steven Paskal, CIH; 17 David Zhang, M.D.; and Charles Ay.” Dkt. # 344. Puget Sound Commerce Center, f/k/a Todd 18 19 Shipyard, clarified in reply that its objections to Dr. Zhang and Mr. Paskal’s opinions are not 20 based on the absence of a cumulative exposure calculation, but rather on the fact that the experts 21 leap from evidence of exposure (as provided by Captain Moore and Mr. Ay) to the conclusion 22 that the exposure was a substantial factor in the development of Mr. Wineland’s mesothelioma. 23 Dkt. # 506 at 4. Plaintiffs will be given an opportunity to respond to this argument, which neither 24 25 they nor the Court recognized or appreciated when reviewing the moving papers. 26 27 1 The Clerk of Court is directed to renote Dkt. # 344 on the Court’s calendar for Friday, 2 November 20, 2020. Plaintiffs may, on or before the note date, file a sur-reply of no more than 3 twelve pages addressing the reliability of Dr. Zhang and Mr. Paskal’s “substantial contributing 4 factor” opinions in light of the Ninth Circuit’s rejection of the “every exposure” theory of 5 causation in McIndoe v. Huntington Ingalls Inc., 817 F.3d 1170, 1176-77 (9th Cir. 2016). 6 7 8 Dated this 10th day of November, 2020. 9 10 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27