Wilson v. State

855 So. 2d 686, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14797, 2003 WL 22239192
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 92
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 2003·No. No. 2D03-1811·Published

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

Alexander C. Wilson challenges the trial court order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse the trial court order and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Wilson claims that his sentences as a habitual felony offender are illegal in that he is serving sixty-three months for each of three third-degree felonies and that they should be stricken because there is no record of a notice of habitualization or transcript of his sentencing hearing. He also claims that the sentencing court improperly enhanced his sentence when prior convictions were included on his score-sheet without the benefit of certified copies of his convictions.

The State responded to these claims and conceded that “this cause should [be] remanded to the trial court to attach portions of the record to support its finding[s].” We agree.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 855 So. 2d 686, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14797, 2003 WL 22239192 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

855 So. 2d 686 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.