Wilson v. State

633 So. 2d 122, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2724, 1994 WL 90503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 So. 2d 775
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1994·No. No. 93-1920·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mario Shanod Wilson appeals his convictions on two counts of armed robbery and one count of unlawful possession of a weapon while engaged in a criminal offense. No reversible error has been shown as to the convictions for armed robbery, and those convictions are therefore affirmed.

The State concedes that the conviction for unlawful possession of a weapon while engaged in a criminal offense, see § 790.07(1), Fla.Stat. (1991), must be vacated on authority of Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145, 1146 (Fla.1991); see also Williams v. State, 630 So.2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Wilkins v. State, 600 So.2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 633 So. 2d 122, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2724, 1994 WL 90503 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

633 So. 2d 122 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland v. State
587 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Wilkins v. State
600 So. 2d 567 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Williams v. State
630 So. 2d 234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)