Wilson v. State

590 So. 2d 5, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11767, 1991 WL 248687
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 547 So. 2d 215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1991·No. No. 90-3252·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence for sale of cocaine and possession with intent to sell cocaine. We need not reach appellant’s point charging that section 775.084, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, is unconstitutional for impermissibly embracing more than one subject since appellant could have been habitualized under the pre-amendment statute as well. See King v. State, 585 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Wright v. State, 579 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 590 So. 2d 5, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11767, 1991 WL 248687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

590 So. 2d 5 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
585 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Wright v. State
579 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)