Wilson v. State

542 So. 2d 433, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1030, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2241, 1989 WL 39568
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1989·No. No. 87-2659·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Admission of hearsay testimony concerning two absent psychological experts’ conclusions respecting appellant’s sanity was prejudicial. The prejudice was not overcome by the trial court’s attempt at a curative instruction. Inasmuch as we cannot say that the error was harmless, we must reverse. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 (Fla.1986).

Additionally, we observe that section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1987), establishes no minimum mandatory sentence for a defendant’s possession or use of a firearm while perpetrating a manslaughter. Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1986).

GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., and ESQUIROZ, MARGARITA, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 542 So. 2d 433, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1030, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2241, 1989 WL 39568 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

542 So. 2d 433 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
569 So. 2d 1387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)