Wilson v. State
488 So. 2d 615, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1098, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7744
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 433 So. 2d 1301 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s sentences, but remand to the trial court with instructions to correct the written order to reflect that these are non-guidelines sentences, see Hart v. State, 464 So.2d 592 (Fla.2d DCA 1985), and further, to correct the order revoking probation to reflect that appellant was found guilty of violating probation by committing theft, rather than possession of a stolen automobile and robbery. See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla.2d DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 488 So. 2d 615, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1098, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
488 So. 2d 615 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bogan v. State
462 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Hart v. State
464 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)