Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wilson v. State

485 So. 2d 42, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 699, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6947

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 20, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1284

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 485 So. 2d 42 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. State, 485 So. 2d 42, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 699, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6947 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

UPCHURCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence imposed for possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell. Appellant contends that the departure sentence was invalid because it was not supported by written reasons as required under State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). We agree.

At sentencing the trial judge stated that he was following the state’s recommendations for departure. On the scoresheet under “Reasons for Departure,” the trial judge merely indicated that the state was to provide an addendum to the scoresheet setting forth reasons for aggravation. This is not sufficient. The trial court cannot delegate its responsibility of formulating reasons for departure to the state. Carnegie v. State, 473 So.2d 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

The state’s arguments in support of departure are without merit. Since the trial court has not provided valid written reasons to support a departure, the sentence is reversed.

REVERSED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI