Wilson v. State

582 So. 2d 817, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7489, 1991 WL 136863
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 547 So. 2d 215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1991·No. No. 88-03326·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his sentences for possession of cocaine and obstructing an [818]*818officer without violence. We remand for resentencing.

After a jury found appellant guilty, the trial court sentenced him to five years in prison on the possession charge and one year in jail for the misdemeanor obstruction charge. The sentences are to be served consecutively. In imposing the sentences, the court departed from the guidelines for the reasons that appellant had involved a minor child in using cocaine and had involved the same minor child in having sexual activities with him. As the state correctly concedes on appeal, the trial court erred in departing upward based on appellant’s conduct for which he was neither charged nor convicted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Hallman v. State, 560 So.2d 223 (Fla.1990); Bradley v. State, 509 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions but vacate his sentences and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 582 So. 2d 817, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7489, 1991 WL 136863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

582 So. 2d 817 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradley v. State
509 So. 2d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hallman v. State
560 So. 2d 223 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)