Wilson v. State
531 So. 2d 1031
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1235 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. Appellant has requested this court to correct the sentence document for Count III, delivery of a controlled substance, in that neither the concurrent nor the consecutive box was checked. We note that pursuant to section 921.16 Florida Statutes, where, as here, the court does not direct that the sentence be served consecutively, a defendant shall serve the sentences concurrently.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 531 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
531 So. 2d 1031 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.