Wilson v. State

566 So. 2d 604, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6923, 1990 WL 132039
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 531 So. 2d 1012
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 1990·No. No. 90-02016·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Donnell Wilson appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconvietion relief. We reverse.

This is the second appeal in connection with Wilson’s motion. In Wilson v. State, 559 So.2d 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), we reversed for further proceedings with regard to one issue. Wilson had alleged that he entered his plea of guilty with the understanding he would receive a sentence of no more than four and one-half years, without consecutive probation. In fact, he received twenty-seven years followed by thirty years’ probation.

After remand the trial judge again denied the motion. He attached a transcript from May 23, 1989, which indicates that Wilson was present in court when his case was discussed, including the possible penalty. Neither this exhibit nor those previously forwarded to this court conclusively refute Wilson’s claim that he was promised a certain sentence. Accordingly, we remand this case for further proceedings consistent with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In the event an evidentiary hearing is deemed to be necessary, it is probably advisable for Wilson to be present. See Barr v. State, 548 So.2d 819 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Reversed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 566 So. 2d 604, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6923, 1990 WL 132039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

566 So. 2d 604 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
559 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Barr v. State
548 So. 2d 819 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)