Wilson v. State

530 So. 2d 347, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1756, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3347, 1988 WL 74797
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1235
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 1988·No. No. 87-243·Published

Opinion

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted of five counts of possession of cocaine with intent to sell and five counts of sale of cocaine in violation of section 893.13(l)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (1985). Each count of sale corresponded to a count of possession with intent to sell which arose from the same act. Appellant contends that conviction of both possession of cocaine with intent to sell and conviction of sale of that same cocaine violates the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Florida Constitutions. We agree. See Gordon v. State, 528 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

We reverse and remand with instructions to vacate either the convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to sell or the convictions for sale of cocaine. The trial court must recalculate the sentence for the remaining counts without the improper counts being scored.

DANAHY and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 530 So. 2d 347, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1756, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3347, 1988 WL 74797 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

530 So. 2d 347 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. State
528 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)