Wilson v. Holloway

70 Ind. 407
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1880·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Howk, J.

— The paper writing, filed in this cause by the appellant and endoi’sed as his brief, is merely an abstract or abbreviated statement of the contents of the record. It is not a brief of the case within the requirements of the rules and decisions of this court. Parker v. Hastings, 12 Ind. 654; Harrison v. Hedges, 60 Ind. 266; and Bray v. The Franklin Life Ins. Co., 68 Ind. 6. The cause has been [408]*408pending here for more than two years, and it is manifest from the files of the ease, that the appellant does not intend to file any additional brief. We think that the case ought to be disposed of.

The judgment is affirmed, at the appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Holloway, 70 Ind. 407 (Ind. 1880).

70 Ind. 407 (Wilson v. Holloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Grantham
4 N.E. 49 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Newcomer v. Hutchings
96 Ind. 119 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Pratt v. Allen
95 Ind. 404 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Kaster v. Kaster
93 Ind. 581 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
McCann v. Rodifer
90 Ind. 602 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
City of Anderson v. Neal
88 Ind. 317 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)