McCann v. Rodifer
90 Ind. 602
Opinion
— The paper writing filed in this cause by the appellant, and endorsed as his brief, is merely a copy of the pleading in the record. It •suggests no reason for the reversal of the judgment, it makes no argument, and it cites no authority. It is not a brief of the cause within the requirements of the rules and decisions of this court. Bray v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 68 Ind. 6; Wilson v. Holloway, 70 Ind. 407; City of Anderson v. Neal, 88 Ind. 317.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCann v. Rodifer, 90 Ind. 602 (Ind. 1883).
90 Ind. 602 (McCann v. Rodifer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alfred Shrimpton & Sons, Ltd. v. Keyes
46 N.E. 651 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1897)
Smith v. McDaniel
32 N.E. 798 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Grantham
4 N.E. 49 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Newcomer v. Hutchings
96 Ind. 119 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Pratt v. Allen
95 Ind. 404 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Robbins v. Magee
96 Ind. 174 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)