McCann v. Rodifer

Indiana Supreme Court

McCann v. Rodifer

90 Ind. 602

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1883

DocketNo. 9584

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 90 Ind. 602 (McCann v. Rodifer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCann v. Rodifer, 90 Ind. 602 (Ind. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Howk, J.

— The paper writing filed in this cause by the appellant, and endorsed as his brief, is merely a copy of the pleading in the record. It •suggests no reason for the reversal of the judgment, it makes no argument, and it cites no authority. It is not a brief of the cause within the requirements of the rules and decisions of this court. Bray v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 68 Ind. 6; Wilson v. Holloway, 70 Ind. 407; City of Anderson v. Neal, 88 Ind. 317.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howk, J.

— The paper writing filed in this cause by the appellant, and endorsed as his brief, is merely a copy of the pleading in the record. It •suggests no reason for the reversal of the judgment, it makes no argument, and it cites no authority. It is not a brief of the cause within the requirements of the rules and decisions of this court. Bray v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 68 Ind. 6; Wilson v. Holloway, 70 Ind. 407; City of Anderson v. Neal, 88 Ind. 317.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 Ind. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccann-v-rodifer-ind-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack