Willis v. State

788 So. 2d 307, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6129, 2001 WL 484260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Willis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 727 So. 2d 952
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2001·No. No. 2D99-4047·Published

Opinion

PARKER, Acting Chief Judge.

Geddes Willis challenges his sentence for possession of cocaine, which was imposed under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. Willis contends that his sentence is illegal and that he is entitled to resentencing under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We agree and reverse.

Willis committed his offense on March 5, 1997. This is within the window for relief under Heggs. Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924, 928 (Fla.2000) (holding that the window for relief under Heggs opened on October 1, 1995, and closed May 24, 1997). The record also reflects that Willis’s sentence under the 1995 guidelines would constitute a departure sentence under the 1994 guidelines. Therefore, Willis is entitled to be resentenced under the 1994 guidelines. Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

We reverse and remand this case for resentencing under the valid guidelines in effect on the date of Willis’s offense.

FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willis v. State, 788 So. 2d 307, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6129, 2001 WL 484260 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

788 So. 2d 307 (Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)