Willis v. State

744 So. 2d 1265, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15747, 1999 WL 1075121
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 1999·No. No. 99-1133·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cecil Ray Willis appeals his sentence imposed after violation of probation, arguing that the trial court erred in refusing to resentence him as a youthful offender. Under section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1997), a trial court may impose a non-youthful offender sentence on a youthful offender who commits violations of probation that involve new substantive offenses. See Hill v. State, 692 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Dunbar v. State, 664 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Johnson v. State, 678 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Here, appellant violated his probation by committing two new substantive offenses. Thus, the trial court was not limited to a youthful offender sentence. Id. Accordingly, we affirm.

LAWRENCE, DAVIS AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willis v. State, 744 So. 2d 1265, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15747, 1999 WL 1075121 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

744 So. 2d 1265 (Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldwire v. State
73 So. 3d 844 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Flores v. State
46 So. 3d 102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Schneider v. State
788 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)