Willis v. State
756 So. 2d 261, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5249, 2000 WL 525607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Willis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 727 So. 2d 952 →
Opinion
Menelek Willis appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Because the record does not conclusively refute his claim, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on his claim that trial counsel should have moved to suppress his statements to police because they were obtained without an effective waiver, taking into specific consideration his age and his parents’ absence from the questioning.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willis v. State, 756 So. 2d 261, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5249, 2000 WL 525607 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
756 So. 2d 261 (Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.