Willis v. State

785 So. 2d 1264, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 2001 WL 609038
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Willis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 727 So. 2d 952
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2829·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction and sentences for robbery with a firearm and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. We affirm the convictions, but remand for clarification of the sentence imposed. The trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence is not consistent with either the sentencing guidelines scoresheet or the written sentencing order. See Turner v. State, 731 So.2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence must comport with written sentencing order).

Affirmed in part; remanded for clarification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willis v. State, 785 So. 2d 1264, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 2001 WL 609038 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

785 So. 2d 1264 (Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. State
731 So. 2d 809 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)