Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
169 F.3d 215, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3340, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,754, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1770, 1999 WL 107104
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 26, 1999·No. No. 97-10685·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en bane with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 169 F.3d 215, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3340, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,754, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1770, 1999 WL 107104 (5th Cir. 1999).
169 F.3d 215 (Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Untitled Case
W.D. Texas, 2026
Kimberly Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College
830 F.3d 698 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Service Temps Inc.
679 F.3d 323 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Pittman v. General Nutrition Corp.
515 F. Supp. 2d 721 (S.D. Texas, 2007)
Lockett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
337 F. Supp. 2d 887 (E.D. Texas, 2004)
Giles v. General Electric Co.
245 F.3d 474 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Irvine v. El Paso Hlthcare Sys
Fifth Circuit, 2001
Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass
Fourth Circuit, 2001
James H. Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass Richard A. Rutta Ernest Stickell
242 F.3d 179 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
Kopenga v. Davric Maine Corp.
1999 ME 65 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1999)