Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

169 F.3d 215, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3340, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,754, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1770, 1999 WL 107104

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 1999

DocketNo. 97-10685

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 169 F.3d 215 (Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 169 F.3d 215, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3340, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,754, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1770, 1999 WL 107104 (5th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en bane with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI