79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1770, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754 Julie Deffenbaugh Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Cross-Appellee

169 F.3d 215
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 1999
Docket97-10685
StatusPublished

This text of 169 F.3d 215 (79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1770, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754 Julie Deffenbaugh Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Cross-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1770, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754 Julie Deffenbaugh Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Cross-Appellee, 169 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

169 F.3d 215

79 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1770,
75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754
Julie Deffenbaugh WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants,
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

No. 97-10685.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 26, 1999.

Mark C. Brodeur, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant.

Jimmy Preston Wrotenbery, Kevin D. Jewell, Magenheim, Bateman, Robinson, Wrotenbery & Helfand, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Eldon B. Mahon, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion Sept. 24, 1998, 5 Cir., 1998, 156 F.3d 581).

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

*

Chief Judge King is recused and did not participate in this decision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
169 F.3d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F.3d 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/79-fair-emplpraccas-bna-1770-75-empl-prac-dec-p-45754-julie-ca5-1999.