Williams v. United States
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN T. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 22-CV-6365 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES, UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On July 30, 2020, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil action in this court in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining permission from the court to file. See Williams v. United States, ECF 1:20-CV-3101, 5 (S.D.N.Y. July 30, 2020), appeal dismissed, No. 20-3138 (2d Cir. Oct. 22, 2020) (dismissal effective Nov. 12, 2020). Plaintiff files this new pro se action, seeks IFP status, and has not sought permission from the court.1 The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s July 30, 2020 order. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).
1 Plaintiff originally filed this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and by memorandum and order dated July 22, 2022, the Eastern District of New York transferred the action to this court. See Williams v. United States, No. 22-CV-4099 (AMD) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. July 22, 2022). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 27, 2022 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. United States (Williams v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.