Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Williams v. State

213 S.E.2d 31, 133 Ga. App. 742, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2267

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 17, 1975

Docket50145

StatusPublished

This text of 213 S.E.2d 31 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 213 S.E.2d 31, 133 Ga. App. 742, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2267 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

Rule 14 (a) of this court provides: "The enumeration of errors shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 20 days after the case is docketed in his office ... Failure to comply with an order of this court directing the filing of the enumeration of errors shall cause the appeal to be dismissed.”

Appellant in this criminal case failed to file an enumeration of errors or brief within 20 days of docketing the appeal, and further failed to comply with the order of this court directing him to file them. We have nevertheless examined the record and considered the appeal on its merits, but we find no reversible error. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb, Judge.

Rule 14 (a) of this court provides: "The enumeration of errors shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 20 days after the case is docketed in his office ... Failure to comply with an order of this court directing the filing of the enumeration of errors shall cause the appeal to be dismissed.”

Appellant in this criminal case failed to file an enumeration of errors or brief within 20 days of docketing the appeal, and further failed to comply with the order of this court directing him to file them. We have nevertheless examined the record and considered the appeal on its merits, but we find no reversible error. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 S.E.2d 31, 133 Ga. App. 742, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-gactapp-1975.