Williams v. State

946 So. 2d 622, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 170, 2007 WL 57827
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3600
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 2007·No. No. 2D05-4734·Published

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

Michael Ramon Williams entered into a negotiated plea concerning several drug-related offenses in three separate cases. He appeals from the judgments and sentences imposed thereon.1 We affirm in all respects without discussion except for a single preserved sentencing error upon which we reverse.

During the pendency of this appeal, Williams filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error concerning the written sentence in circuit court case number 04-CF-4028 for count two, possession of cocaine. At sentencing, the trial court orally pronounced that Williams’ sentence for that conviction was time served. The written sentence, however, reflects a sentence of 78.2 months’ imprisonment.

The trial court did not rule on the rule 3.800(b)(2) motion within sixty days, thus constructively denying it. See Saulsberry v. State, 929 So.2d 664, 664 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse the sentence as to count two in circuit court case number 04-CF-4028 and remand for the entry of an amended sentence that conforms to the oral pronouncement. See id. at 664.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND and CANADY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 946 So. 2d 622, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 170, 2007 WL 57827 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

946 So. 2d 622 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saulsberry v. State
929 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)