Williams v. State

868 So. 2d 646, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3282, 2004 WL 508362
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 787 So. 2d 180
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2004·No. No. 2D03-3624·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shawn C. Williams challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his [647]*647motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order. Williams failed to allege that his jail credit claim could be determined from the face of the record, and he therefore failed to present a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) claim. See Williams v. State, 848 So.2d 389, 389 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We note that Williams’ motion was directed to trial court case numbers 93-2285 and 93-2286, whereas the body of the trial court’s order denied jail credit on trial court case numbers 00-383 and 00-884. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Williams might have to file a facially sufficient jail credit claim pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or a timely facially sufficient claim pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 868 So. 2d 646, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3282, 2004 WL 508362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

868 So. 2d 646 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
848 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)