Williams v. State

884 So. 2d 138, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10457, 2004 WL 1562069
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 2004·No. No. 2D04-743·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WALLACE, Judge.

Kenneth L. Williams seeks review of the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Williams’ motion was based in part on a claim of newly discovered evidence that was facially insufficient. Therefore, we affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to Williams’ right to file a facially sufficient claim based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm without comment the trial court’s summary denial of Williams’ other claims.

Affirmed without prejudice to Williams’ right to refile a facially sufficient claim based on newly discovered evidence within sixty days of the issuance of the mandate in this case.

FULMER and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 884 So. 2d 138, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10457, 2004 WL 1562069 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 138 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
942 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)