Williams v. State
Opinion
Kenneth L. Williams seeks review of the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Williams’ motion was based in part on a claim of newly discovered evidence that was facially insufficient. Therefore, we affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to Williams’ right to file a facially sufficient claim based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm without comment the trial court’s summary denial of Williams’ other claims.
Affirmed without prejudice to Williams’ right to refile a facially sufficient claim based on newly discovered evidence within sixty days of the issuance of the mandate in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
884 So. 2d 138 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.