Williams v. State
805 So. 2d 926, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15215, 2001 WL 1334768
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2001·No. No. 2D01-3116·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Eric 0. Williams appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm as to Williams’ first claim without comment. Williams’ second claim cannot be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See State v. Mancino, 705 So.2d 1379 (Fla.1998). We therefore affirm as to it without prejudice to any right Williams might have to raise it in a timely filed rule 3.850 motion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 805 So. 2d 926, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15215, 2001 WL 1334768 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
805 So. 2d 926 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. State
805 So. 2d 926 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)