Williams v. State
793 So. 2d 1092, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11469, 2001 WL 913948
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 2001·No. No. 4D01-1392·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We have carefully considered all 19 points appellant argued in support of his motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, as well as the state’s response filed in the trial court, and the judge’s order denying relief. We find no merit in any of the arguments appellant has raised, and thus dispense with the necessity of having the state file an answer brief, and affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 793 So. 2d 1092, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11469, 2001 WL 913948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
793 So. 2d 1092 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bio-Med Plus, Inc. v. Health Coalition, Inc.
793 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)