Williams v. State
878 So. 2d 455, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10824, 2004 WL 1621432
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 2004·No. No. 3D03-3322·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On remand, the trial court is directed to strike the requirement of “hard labor” from the defendant’s sentence. Holman v. State, 740 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Burney v. State, 705 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). In all other respects, the trial court’s order dated November 4, 2003, denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 878 So. 2d 455, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10824, 2004 WL 1621432 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
878 So. 2d 455 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Delpa, Inc. v. Martinez
878 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)