Williams v. State

661 So. 2d 137, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10673, 1995 WL 594958
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 87
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1995·No. No. 94-2360·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction. We reverse, however, the imposition of a public defender fee because the trial court failed to advise appellant of his right to contest the amount of the fee. See Mitchell v. State, 640 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Additionally, the trial court erred when it indicated on the judgment that appellant’s offense of possession of cocaine constituted a second degree felony; this offense is a felony of the third degree. See § 893.13(6)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). We remand to the trial court with leave to impose a public defender fee upon proper notice to appellant of his right to contest the amount of such fee within thirty days. We further instruct the trial court to correct the judgment as above stated.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 661 So. 2d 137, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10673, 1995 WL 594958 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

661 So. 2d 137 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. State
640 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)