Williams v. State
This text of 593 So. 2d 1064 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leon WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord with Kelly v. State, 593 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
ANSTEAD, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
ORDERED that appellee's motion filed February 20, 1992, for certification is hereby granted, and the following question is certified to the Florida Supreme Court:
DOES THE SOURCE OF ILLEGAL DRUGS USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL TO CONDUCT REVERSE STINGS CONSTITUTIONALLY SHIELD THOSE WHO BECOME ILLICITLY INVOLVED WITH SUCH DRUGS FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY?
FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's motion filed February 20, 1992, to stay mandate is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
593 So. 2d 1064, 1992 WL 16625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.