State v. Wallace
This text of 606 So. 2d 1261 (State v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Kelly v. State, 593 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 599 So.2d 1280 (Fla.1992) and Williams v. State, 593 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, No: 79,507 (Fla. July 6, 1992).
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
ORDERED that appellant’s motion filed October 29, 1992, for rehearing is hereby denied; further,
ORDERED that appellant’s motion filed October 29, 1992, for certification of question is granted, and the following question is hereby certified to the Supreme Court of Florida:
DOES THE SOURCE OF ILLEGAL DRUGS USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL TO CONDUCT REVERSE STINGS CONSTITUTIONALLY SHIELD THOSE WHO BECAME ILLICITLY INVOLVED WITH SUCH DRUGS FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
606 So. 2d 1261, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11256, 1992 WL 310333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wallace-fladistctapp-1992.