State v. Wallace

606 So. 2d 1261, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11256, 1992 WL 310333
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 28, 1992·No. No. 92-0775·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Kelly v. State, 593 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 599 So.2d 1280 (Fla.1992) and Williams v. State, 593 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, No: 79,507 (Fla. July 6, 1992).

LETTS, GUNTHER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., JR., Senior Judge, concur.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

ORDERED that appellant’s motion filed October 29, 1992, for rehearing is hereby denied; further,

ORDERED that appellant’s motion filed October 29, 1992, for certification of question is granted, and the following question is hereby certified to the Supreme Court of Florida:

DOES THE SOURCE OF ILLEGAL DRUGS USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL TO CONDUCT REVERSE STINGS CONSTITUTIONALLY SHIELD THOSE WHO BECAME ILLICITLY INVOLVED WITH SUCH DRUGS FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wallace, 606 So. 2d 1261, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11256, 1992 WL 310333 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 1261 (State v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wallace
623 So. 2d 1191 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)