Coley v. State

605 So. 2d 606, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10804, 1992 WL 280368
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 14, 1992
DocketNo. 92-2683
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 605 So. 2d 606 (Coley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coley v. State, 605 So. 2d 606, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10804, 1992 WL 280368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review on an order that reserved ruling on his motion for post conviction relief. The trial court acted within its discretion when it reserved ruling pending the supreme court’s disposition in Williams v. State, 593 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Appellant has failed to demon[607]*607strate jurisdiction in this court for certiora-ri review or as provided in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Santiago v. State
608 So. 2d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
605 So. 2d 606, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10804, 1992 WL 280368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coley-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.