Williams v. State

647 So. 2d 1069, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 13190, 1994 WL 717928
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 593 So. 2d 1064
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1994·No. No. 94-01999·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Williams originally appealed the denial of his motion brought pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(a), but, thereafter, conceded that the denial should be affirmed based upon Walls v. State, 627 So.2d 107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), and we agree. However, Williams properly demonstrated that a scrivener’s error exists in the sentencing documents concerning the degree of crimes for which he was convicted, a technical defect admitted by the state. Therefore, we reverse the judgment entered against Williams and remand for entry of an amended judgment to correctly demonstrate that Williams was convicted of two second-degree felonies, rather than the first-degree felonies presently reflected.

Reversed and Remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 647 So. 2d 1069, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 13190, 1994 WL 717928 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 1069 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walls v. State
627 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)