Williams v. State
593 So. 2d 623, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1688, 1992 WL 32781
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 542 So. 2d 479 →
Opinion
As the state concedes, the trial court erred in imposing public defender fees without affording appellant proper notice and an opportunity to be heard. See Smiley v. State, 590 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and Hostzclaw v. State, 561 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of such fees and remand but affirm the judgment and sentence in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 593 So. 2d 623, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1688, 1992 WL 32781 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
593 So. 2d 623 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smiley v. State
590 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Hostzclaw v. State
561 So. 2d 1323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)