Williams v. State

541 So. 2d 1361, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1060, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2280, 1989 WL 41175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1727
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1989·No. No. 88-02156·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for robbery. We have carefully examined all the issues the appellant has raised regarding his conviction but find no error. Accordingly, his conviction is affirmed. Although the appellant was a juvenile at the time of the robbery and resulting conviction, the trial court sentenced him as an adult without providing written reasons as mandated in section 39.111(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1987), and State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984). The state concedes that this was error. Therefore, we vacate the appellant’s sentence and remand the cause for proper resentencing.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 541 So. 2d 1361, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1060, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2280, 1989 WL 41175 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

541 So. 2d 1361 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rhoden
448 So. 2d 1013 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)