Williams v. State
599 So. 2d 1017, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4876, 1992 WL 83874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 542 So. 2d 479 →
Opinions
Appellant challenges his sentence for violation of probation. The state concedes that the trial court erred by increasing appellant’s sentence upward in excess of a single cell. Upon finding that appellant violated probation, the court was permitted to increase appellant’s sentence only to the next higher cell. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14). Accordingly, the sentence imposed on appellant for violation of probation is reversed and remanded for sentencing within the guidelines or increased only to the next higher cell.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 599 So. 2d 1017, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4876, 1992 WL 83874 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
599 So. 2d 1017 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
594 So. 2d 273 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)