Williams v. State

547 So. 2d 1269, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1997, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4748, 1989 WL 97709
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 1989·No. No. 88-1720·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WILLIS, BEN C. (Ret’d), Associate Judge.

In this case, as in Williams v. State, 541 So.2d 752 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), the trial court imposed the condition that appellant return on the date set for sentencing after accepting appellant’s plea of nolo conten-dere. Since the condition was not a part of the plea bargain, the trial court should have granted appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea, once the court determined it would not impose sentence in accordance with the terms of the negotiated plea.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with .directions that appellant be afforded an opportunity to withdraw his nolo conten-dere plea.

SHIVERS, C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 547 So. 2d 1269, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1997, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4748, 1989 WL 97709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

547 So. 2d 1269 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collier v. State
590 So. 2d 456 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Yeargin Const. Co. v. Hutchinson
547 So. 2d 1269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)