Williams v. State

495 So. 2d 921, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2186, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10081
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1986·No. No. 4-86-1485·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for habeas corpus to file a belated appeal.

On the merits, we reverse and remand to the trial court with alternative direction either (a) to issue a subsequent order, attaching thereto the portions of the record in support thereof as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, or (b)'to conduct an evidentiary hearing and rule upon the allegations raised in petitioner’s motion.

This being a pro se proceeding, we remind petitioner that in order to obtain further review in this court, he must appeal any new ruling of the trial court upon remand.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 495 So. 2d 921, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2186, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10081 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

495 So. 2d 921 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seago v. State
503 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Epps v. Hartley
495 So. 2d 921 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)