Williams v. State

500 So. 2d 636, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11084
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 447 So. 2d 442
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 1986·No. No. 85-2092·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction of battery on a law enforcement officer, however, we reverse on the issue of costs, and remand to the trial court with instructions to strike the costs imposed on Williams. First, Williams was given neither prior notice of the assessment of costs nor a hearing as required by Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Second, we reverse and remand for the trial court to strike assessment of $200 pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), because the crime for which appellant was convicted occurred prior to the effective date of the statute. Consequently, the penalty is a violation of the ex post facto [637]*637clause. Signorelli v. State, 491 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Yost v. State, 489 So.2d 131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

AFFIRM IN PART; REVERSE IN PART; AND REMAND.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 500 So. 2d 636, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

500 So. 2d 636 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Yost v. State
489 So. 2d 131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Signorelli v. State
491 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)