Williams v. State
546 So. 2d 135, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1712, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4035, 1989 WL 78348
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1727 →
Opinion
We affirm the order revoking probation because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that appellant participated in a robbery while on probation. We strike, however, those provisions of the revocation order finding appellant violated his probation by failing to pay costs and possessing stolen property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 546 So. 2d 135, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1712, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4035, 1989 WL 78348 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
546 So. 2d 135 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.