Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

558 So. 2d 533, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2041, 1990 WL 35448
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1745 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 1990·No. No. 89-0463·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

PER CURIAM.

We grant the public defender’s Anders motion to withdraw without prejudice. We agree that the designated judicial acts are wholly frivolous and without merit. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant did not respond to the notice of motion nor did he file a supplemental brief.

We affirm appellant’s delivery of cocaine conviction and sentence.

HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 558 So. 2d 533, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2041, 1990 WL 35448 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 533 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)